What is the difference between fascism and communism and socialism

The state is run by members of the working class in the interest of the working class. Collectivism - Communist countries demand that all property is turned over to the state to be shared with all citizens. Government Control - Communists believe that the government must intervene heavily in citizens' lives to keep them from achieving more than others.

This includes control over education, employment and even marriage and family. Far-Left Ideology, Far-Right Tactics - The concepts of social equality and sharing resources are a fundamental part of far-left ideology. However, the modern implementation of communism, including authoritarianism and limiting individual freedom, are closer to the right side of the political spectrum.

International Influence - Communism is meant to be spread across the globe, not controlled within a country's borders. Revolution - In order to achieve a communist utopia, the communist party must revolt against the ruling class — violently, if necessary. While some communists believe in reforming an existing government, most think that the entire structure must be overthrown and started again.

What Is Socialism? Origins of Socialism The term socialism comes from the Latin sociare and the French social , meaning "to share. Principles of Socialism The clearest way to see the differences between communism and socialism are in their philosophies.

Some of the main principles of socialism include: Central Planning - Purely socialist governments intervene in economic activity, rather than trust the "invisible hand" of the free market. This includes government-owned companies and price regulation by bureaucrats. Collective Ownership - Also known as "social" or "common" ownership, this principle contends that the factors of production labor, goods, natural resources should be owned by all members of a society.

Cooperation over Competition - Socialists reject the competitive nature of capitalism. They embrace egalitarianism as the ideal way to ensure social stability. Distribution of Wealth - Socialist societies have high tax rates that are redistributed into government programs and infrastructure.

It relates to Marx's quote: "From each according to ability, to each according to need. It works to eliminate social and economic barriers based on prejudice or lack of access.

Far-Left Ideology - Socialism can be as far left on the political spectrum as fascism is far right. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.

The church also played a major role in all of the European fascist countries Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal as the authority on religious and moral issues, which was opposed to the threat of "godless communists".

Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism , the materialist conception of history of human civilization can be explained simply through the conflict of interests among the various social groups and by the change and development in the means and instruments of production Fascism, now and always, believes in holiness and in heroism ; that is to say, in actions influenced by no economic motive, direct or indirect.

And if the economic conception of history be denied, according to which theory men are no more than puppets, carried to and fro by the waves of chance, while the real directing forces are quite out of their control, it follows that the existence of an unchangeable and unchanging class-war is also denied - the natural progeny of the economic conception of history. And above all Fascism denies that class-war can be the preponderant force in the transformation of society After Socialism, Fascism combats the whole complex system of democratic ideology , and repudiates it, whether in its theoretical premises or in its practical application.

We have a mixed economy here, with Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and some welfare, like food stamps and unemployment. This might give you a better description of the difference between socialism and fascism. Contrary to what you might think both of these ideas are to the left of center. What makes them similar is that both require a strong central government which provides for the society.

Thank you for pointing this out. I was thinking the same thing when I read this article. The most famous socialist in history started the fascist party. Hard to think that one is that different then the other.

Another excellent point. Mussolini the founder of fascism was a Marxist. He did not hide this fact. Hitler was a socialist, again a fact he did not hide this. Why is there a determination by academics to show fascism on the left, when economically its policies are planned economies run by the state or controlled by the state.

Possibly because academics are left wing by nature fed by the public purse and refuse to accept this fact. The fact they sit beside a racist theory so closely should not surprise anyone. Thereafter differentiating based on class or race is a short step, as this the choice to remove freedom and choice itself.

Its great to see people question the traditional boxes with which economic and political theories have been placed. The article explain this point too if you are patient enough to go to the point. Did you ever think that for capitalism also defined by Marx it was a great point to assimilate fascism and socialism as fascism is charged with all the blame of the WWII? It seems that socialism and fascism have more in common than not. If you look at the differences you could really call them similarities.

Fascism is Socialism on steroids. Socialism is just a softer form of communism as well. They are all tied up in a very similar ideology of the state over the people. These are all left wing beliefs and fascism is not a right wing ideology. This is a falsehood that fascism is right wing.

While socialism calls for the redistribution of wealth so that equality is created, this calls for the government to be in control of everything. Socialism is very closely related to fascism and communism, all left wing. Actually you are wrong, fascism is leftwing, not rightwing.

That is a prime example of the fascist ideology applied to economic theory. History has proven that socialism and fascism is roughly the same thing. The most efficient state and most powerful state in the world during the 20 century was Nazi Germany they went from a collapsing state to a state of super power in under 5 years.

Yes they also fell real quick but that was more the fault of the leaders then the government ideals. What this article gets wrong is Germany was fascist socialist country during this time. German citizen life during the golden years was the best in the world compared to everyone else. Unless you were one of the states listed problems… anyways what I do not understand is why people still refuse to see this. Socialism works but you need smart leadership to propel it forward like any thing else.

The only states that cant do this are vassals to other states. The United States is a prime example of a vessel country to other interest. Not exactly a good model. In fact, down right evil. This site perpetrates an evil that continue among leftists and that is the idea that Fascism is on the right. By the definition given Fascism is a system of total government control. Nothing on the right meets that definition, but leftism does.

Another failure of this article is to conflate Fascism with Nazism. This claim was also a lie as Nationalism appears on both the left and the right and is not a defining characteristic of each. The latest fiction of the left is that nobody has done socialism correctly. This fiction appeared after the publication of the Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, this work demonstrated that every instance of Socialism results in inhumanity and death on a mass scale.

Prior to the death of Hugo Chavez lefists pointed to Venezuela as a successful Socialist regime. The only form of Socialism that never had a chance to fail on its own was Nazism as it was defeated by the Allies in Mussolini was a Marxist, he always was, he simply believed socialism failed and that it should be replaced by a more nationalist marxisim, ergo fascism based on a misinterpretation of nietzsches superman and platos Republic with an emphasis on the nation state economy.

Capitalism was and is an invention of Marx and engels misrepresentation of the free market. In all economic systems you have corruption, monopolies etc, but Smith et al rallied against this and called for regulation. Marx stated that this corruption, when you ran across it, was the system, he was a turd really.

We do not have capitalism. America uses the term interchangeably and this is reason why fwit socialists still exist. If they used even a modicum of effort and read the road to serfdom they would wake up to were the evil of corruption sleeps easiest. The choice would only be: which poison do you want to die from? And the "moderates" would then be those who eat a mixture of arsenic and cyanide.

What would be omitted from this setup? The political equivalent of the arsenic-cyanide spectrum is the fascism-communism spectrum. What is omitted from the setup? A free society--which means: capitalism. What is the actual opposite of capitalism? The term "statism" was tirelessly promoted by Ayn Rand. A computer search of her published works for "statism" or "statist" gives over hits. She described statism as the idea that "man's life and work belong to the state--to society, to the group, the gang, the race, the nation--and that the state may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own, tribal, collective good.

Fascism and communism are two variants of statism. Both are forms of dictatorship. Neither one recognizes individual rights nor permits individual freedom. The differences are non-essential: fascism is racial statism and communism is statism of economic class.

Communism advocates the abolition of private property; socialism advocates government ownership of the means of production.

Fascism leaves that property in private hands--then shackles those hands, every economic decision being directed by the state.